4.7 Article

Waste management Life Cycle Assessment: the case of a reciprocating air compressor in Brazil

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 164-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.034

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment; Waste management scenarios; End-of-life; Air compressor

Funding

  1. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Choose an environmentally End-of-Life (EoL) strategy is not an easy task. From a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) point of view, depending on the processes and destinations applied after use, the entire life cycle is affected, even earlier steps, such as the acquisition of raw materials and manufacturing. This paper aimed to assess the environmental impacts of an air compressor in Brazil, from cradle to the grave, with focus on the comparison of three waste management alternatives. We defined a Remanufacturing, Recycling and Landfilling scenarios following European Directive on waste management hierarchy. LCA methodology was applied to evaluate the potentials impacts on Global Warming, Abiotic Resource Depletion, Total Cumulative Energy Demand and Land Occupation based on primary data collected by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). The case study indicates that the hotspot of this product system occurs in the use phase due the high demand of energy during its long life span. This predominance is such that it overcomes the differences among the three EoL scenarios. Removing this phase in LCA's result interpretation we found that for all categories Remanufacturing has the best environmental performance followed by Recycling and Landfilling. Remanufacturing was able to reduce the environmental impact by more than 40% compared to Landfilling through a reduced consumption of raw materials, manufacturing processes and environmental gains of avoided products. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available