4.7 Article

Autophagic flux and autophagosome morphogenesis require the participation of sphingolipids

Journal

APOPTOSIS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 645-657

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-015-1102-8

Keywords

Sphingolipids; Gangliosides; Lipid rafts; Autophagy; Cell death; Apoptosis; Pathology

Funding

  1. Peretti Foundation
  2. Arcobaleno Onlus
  3. AIRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis and autophagy are two evolutionary conserved processes that exert a critical role in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. While apoptosis is a tightly regulated cell program implicated in the removal of damaged or unwanted cells, autophagy is a cellular catabolic pathway that is involved in the lysosomal degradation and recycling of proteins and organelles, and is thereby considered an important cytoprotection mechanism. Sphingolipids (SLs), which are ubiquitous membrane lipids in eukaryotes, participate in the generation of various membrane structures, including lipid rafts and caveolae, and contribute to a number of cellular functions such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and, as suggested more recently, autophagy. For instance, SLs are hypothesized to be involved in several intracellular processes, including organelle membrane scrambling, whilst at the plasma membrane lipid rafts, acting as catalytic domains, strongly contribute to the ignition of critical signaling pathways determining cell fate. In particular, by targeting several shared regulators, ceramide, sphingosine-1-phosphate, dihydroceramide, sphingomyelin and gangliosides seem able to differentially regulate the autophagic pathway and/or contribute to the autophagosome formation. This review illustrates recent studies on this matter, particularly lipid rafts, briefly underscoring the possible implication of SLs and their alterations in the autophagy disturbances and in the pathogenesis of some human diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available