Journal
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 84-92Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.033
Keywords
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Urban water; Potable water; Wastewater; Desalination; Tertiary treatment
Categories
Funding
- CDTI (Centre for technological and Industrial Development) under the CENIT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Urban water authorities in many countries are struggling to satisfy the increasing demand for both potable and non-potable water whilst also improving the environmental profile of the urban water system. The main goal of this study is to use the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to carry out an environmental analysis of every stage of the urban water cycle in Tarragona, a Mediterranean city of Spain (scenario I). These stages are: water abstraction, potable water treatment, intermediate pumping, distribution network, sewage collection and wastewater treatment. This study also proposes possible scenarios for improving the environmental performance reducing the high level of water stress resulting from increasing demand and limited resources: using reclaimed water (scenario II) and using desalination plants and reclaimed water to supply water during a drought (scenario III). Inventory analysis was performed using local operation data. In the current situation (scenario I) the main environmental impacts on urban water cycle were caused by 35.2% of distribution network, 20.5% of collection pumping and 13.8% of wastewater treatment plant for the Global Warming Potential impact category because these stages have high energy consumption. In Reclaimed water (scenario II), no significant improvement in indicators is observed, because the addition of environmental loads introduced by the tertiary treatment, except for the reduction in freshwater consumption due to the net water saving. In the drought scenario (scenario III), all impact categories have been increased from Scenario II e.g. 18% in Photochemical Oxidation, 21% in Eutrophication Potential, 30% Ozone Depletion Potential and Ecotoxicity Potential, 36% in Depletion of Abiotic Resources and Cumulative Energy Demand, 38% in Global Warming Potential and 42% in Acidification Potential. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available