4.7 Article

Performance enhancement of fire retardant finish with environment friendly bio cross-linker for cotton

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 191-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.031

Keywords

Fire retardant; Environmentally friendly finishing; Cotton finishing; Cross-linkers; Easy care finishing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-methylol dimethylphosphonopropionamide, commercially famous as Pyrovatex, is among the most commonly used fire retardant for cotton fabric. Unfortunately, Pyrovatex has the issue of releasing formaldehyde and further requires formaldehyde based cross-linkers to improve the fire retardancy, durability, and easy care performance. Consequently, toxic formaldehyde level is significantly increased in the treated cotton fabric. In our research, one bath, par-dry-cure method was used for the application and fixation of the fire retardant and cross-linker. Citric acid was used as a formaldehyde free cross-linking agent for cotton. Sodium hypophosphite (SHP) was used as catalyst for cross-linking of citric acid with cotton. In the presence of citric acid and catalyst with Pyrovatex, fire retardancy of the fabric was increased due to the enhanced bonding of Pyrovatex with cotton. In addition, phosphorous based catalyst SHP further increased the phosphorous in the system; consequently, fire retardancy is further improved. Therefore, only 200 g/L of Pyrovatex with citric acid and catalyst exhibited much better fire retardancy than using 400 g/L of the Pyrovatex alone. The crease recovery angle of the 200 g/L Pyrovatex treated fabric was raised from 188 degrees to 239 degrees when 80 g/L of citric acid was also incorporated into the recipe. Washing durability and tensile performance of the combination treated samples were better as compared to standard fabric. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available