4.7 Article

The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 18, Issue 14, Pages 1358-1365

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017

Keywords

Contractor; Construction; Environmental management; Green innovation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [70772067]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [20090073110029, NCET-06-410]
  3. Shuguang Planning of Shanghai Education Development Foundation [06SG17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the construction industry, contractors have been facing the challenge to meet the emerging needs related to the reduction of environmental impacts during the construction process. Generally, the commitment of efforts and resources from contractors to meet these needs is motivated by the influence exerted from environmental regulations and stakeholder demands. However, managerial environmental concerns and size of firms also account as key factors affecting the adoption of green construction practices. Therefore, the aim of this research is to identify those factors influencing contractors to adopt green construction practices by using data gathered from a survey. From the results, it has been found that managerial concern is the most important driver for the adoption of green practices. Significant relationships have also been found between government regulations and business size with the adoption of green construction practices. However, there is no significant evidence on the relationship among the adoption of green construction practices with perceived stakeholders' pressures. The findings from this study are significant in the understanding on the factors of green construction management. This knowledge may contribute to better decision-making towards implementing green construction practices. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available