4.3 Article

Transfer Learning Based on Regularized Common Spatial Patterns Using Cosine Similarities of Spatial Filters for Motor-Imagery BCI

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218126619501238

Keywords

Transfer learning; regularized common spatial patterns; cosine similarities; spatial filters; brain-computer interface

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273282, 61861021]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Education Department of Jiangxi Province [GJJ170272, GJJ15042]
  3. Advantage Technological Innovation Team Construction Project of Jiangxi Province [20171BCB24001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20171BAB201013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In motor-imagery brain-computer interface (BCI), transfer learning based on the framework of regularized common spatial patterns (RCSP) can make full use of the training data derived from other subjects to reduce calibration time for a new subject. Covariance matrices are commonly used to estimate the difference between subjects. However, the classification performances vary greatly depending on different assumptions of the distribution of covariance matrices. Therefore, to directly observe the variations of the target subject's features after transferring, we neglect the distribution of covariance matrices and instead compare cosine similarities of spatial filters between the target subject and the composite subject whose data comes from the target subject and a source subject. Two RCSP algorithms based on cosine measure are proposed to use the samples of all source subjects and most useful source subjects, respectively. Experiments on one public data set from BCI competition show that our proposed approaches significantly improve the classification performances compared to the conventional CSP algorithm in almost every case, based on a small training set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available