4.5 Article

Analysis of microdialysate monoamines, including noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin, using capillary ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.01.023

Keywords

Monoamine neurotransmitter; Ultra high performance liquid; chromatography; Microdialysis; Electrochemical detection

Funding

  1. Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University
  2. Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL)
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicate (INSERM)
  5. Structure Federative de Recherche (SFR) Biosciences Gerland - Lyon Sud

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical methods are very often used to detect catecholamine and indolamine neurotransmitters separated by conventional reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The present paper presents the development of a chromatographic method to detect monoamines present in low-volume brain dialysis samples using a capillary column filled with sub-2 mu m particles. Several parameters (repeatability, linearity, accuracy, limit of detection) for this new ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method with electrochemical detection were examined after optimization of the analytical conditions. Noradrenaline, adrenaline, serotonin, dopamine and its metabolite 3-methoxytyramine were separated in 1 mu l. of injected sample volume; they were detected above concentrations of 0.5-1 nmol/L, with 2.1-9.5% accuracy and intra-assay repeatability equal to or less than 6%. The final method was applied to very low volume dialysates from rat brain containing monoamine traces. The study demonstrates that capillary UHPLC with electrochemical detection is suitable for monitoring dialysate monoamines collected at high sampling rate. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available