4.5 Article

Determination of nitroimidazole residues in aquaculture tissue using ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.04.024

Keywords

Nitroimidazole residues; UHPLC-MS/MS; Aquaculture; Prawn; Shrimp; Salmon; Trout; Sea bass; Tilapia

Funding

  1. Food for Health Research Initiative (FHRI)
  2. Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine and the Health Research Board [07FHRI-AFRC5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantitative confirmatory analysis of residues of nitroimidazole drugs (dimetridazole, ipronidazole, metronidazole, ornidazole and ronidazole) and their corresponding hydroxy metabolites (HMMNI, ipronidazile-OH and metronidazole-OH) in aquaculture tissue. Samples were extracted by shaking in acetonitrile, water, MgSO4 and NaCl before being defatted with n-hexane pre-saturated with acetonitrile and concentrated under nitrogen. Nitroimidazole residues were determined by UHPLC-MS/MS operating in positive electrospray ionisation mode using a reversed phase BEH C-18 column. The method was validated according to the EU Commission Decision 2002/657/EC guidelines. The following performance studies were carried out: specificity, selectivity, linearity, within laboratory repeatability (WLr)/reproducibility (WLR), accuracy, precision, decision limit (CC alpha), detection capability (CC beta), absolute recovery and stability. The analytical range of the method is 0.1-20 mu g kg(-1). Accuracy and precision of the method, under within-laboratory reproducibility conditions, ranged from 83 to 105% and 2.3 to 14.0%, respectively. CC alpha were 0.07-1.0 mu g kg(-1) depending on analyte and matrix. A total of 50 samples can be analysed in a single day using the assay. The method has been extensively evaluated through application to real test samples. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available