4.5 Article

Rapid and simultaneous quantitation of prostanoids by UPLC-MS/MS in rat brain

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.11.041

Keywords

Arachidonic acid; Cyclooxygenase; Eicosanoids; Ischemic stroke; Prostanoids; UPLC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. AHA [10BGIA3580040]
  2. NIH [R01HD075760]
  3. [R01NS37459]
  4. [S10RR023461]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The metabolites of arachidonic acid (AA) produced from the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway, collectively termed as prostanoids, and from the CYP 450 pathway, eicosanoids, have been implicated in various neuro-degenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases. This study developed a quantitative UPLC-MS/MS method to simultaneously measure 11 prostanoids including prostaglandins and cyclopentenone metabolites in the rat brain cortical tissue. Linear calibration curves ranging from 0.104 to 33.3 ng/ml were validated. The inter-day and intra-day variance for all metabolites was less than 15%. The extraction recovery efficiency and matrix (deionized water) effects measured at 12.5 ng/ml (750 pg on column) ranged from 88 to 100% and 3 to 14%, respectively, with CV% values below 20%. Additionally, applying the processing and extraction conditions of this method to our previous CYP450 eicosanoids method resulted in overall improvement in extraction recovery and reduction in matrix effects at low (0.417 ng/ml) and high (8.33 ng/ml) concentrations. In rat brain cortical tissue samples, concentrations of prostanoids ranged from 10.2 to 937 pmol/g wet tissue and concentration of eicosanoids ranged from 2.23 to 793 pmol/g wet tissue. These data demonstrate that the successive measurement of prostanoids and eicosanoids from a single extracted sample of rat brain tissue can be achieved with a UPLC-MS/MS system and that this method is necessary for evaluation of these metabolites to delineate their role in various neuroinflammatory and cerebrovascular disorders. (C) 2013 Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available