4.5 Article

Determination of amantadine and rimantadine in chicken muscle by QuEChERS pretreatment method and UHPLC coupled with LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.08.020

Keywords

Amantadine; Rimantadine; QuEChERS method; UHPLC; LTQ Orbitrap MS; Chicken muscle tissues

Funding

  1. National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA101603]
  2. Science and technology planning project of General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) of PR China [20121K145]
  3. AQSIQ industrial public service scientific research project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of PR China [201210029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel sample pretreatment method was developed for the quantitative determination of amantadine and rimantadine in chicken muscle tissues by ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap MS). The samples were pretreated by modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) method, using acetonitrile (1% acetic acid, v/v) as extraction solution and C-18 sorbent for clean-up. The separation was carried out on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (150 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.8 mu m particle), using a mobile phase of acetonitrile and 0.1% aqueous formic acid solution. LTQ Orbitrap MS with resolving power of 60 000 was applied for analysis of the samples. Amantadine and rimantadine were identified from their accurate mass (within 5 ppm) and retention times from the acquired full-scan chromatogram and quantified by their peak areas. The linear range for the determination of the analytes was 1-100 mu g/kg. Limits of detection (LODs) for amantadine and rimantadine were 1.02 mu g/kg and 0.67 mu g/kg, respectively. The intra- and inter-day accuracy ranged from 87.5% to 102.4%, and 82.5% to 105.8% for amantadine, and 95.3% to 97.4%, and 89.4% to 93.2% for rimantadine, respectively. The precision of intra- and inter-day was between 3.9-6.3% and 5.95-13.9% for amantadine, 6.0-7.45% and 7.8-12.4% for rimantadine, respectively. Finally, the method was applied for the determination of these antiviral agents in routine samples, and amantadine residue was detected in some cases. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available