4.5 Article

Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in dried blood spots and implications for its quantitation by tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.05.040

Keywords

Dried blood spots; 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Punch location; Whatman 903; FTA; LC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, Australia) [623208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dried blood spots (DBS) are a convenient collection and archiving method for blood specimens. The interest in screening certain analytes in neonatal DBS continues to increase for a variety of paediatric disorders. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-3 (25OHD(3)) is one such analyte. We investigated potential factors that may affect the analysis of 25OHD(3) in prospective cohorts of DBS, such as blood spot volume, hole punch position, and paper type. All of these factors were shown to affect 25OHD(3) levels measured. When blood volumes of <50 mu L were spotted, 25OHD(3) concentrations extracted were significantly lower (P < 0.0001). We also observed a chromatographic effect across the surface of blood spots, with 25OHD(3) concentrations significantly higher in outer punched spots compared to those punched from the centre (P < 0.0001). This also correlates with a heavier net weight of blood from outer punched spots (P < 0.0001). This effect was reproducible on two types of paper cards (Whatman 903 (R) and FTA (R)), and paper type was shown to be highly relevant. We also show that the distribution of 25OHD(3) in whole blood is essentially extracellular, with over 98% of 25OHD(3) residing in the serum component.This may potentially explain why the diffusion properties of blood and type of chromatographic paper may significantly influence the distribution of such analytes in DBS. These factors should be taken into consideration for the prospective collection of DBS and analysis of 25OHD(3) in DBS. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available