4.5 Article

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry procedure for the quantification of sunitinib (SU11248) and its active metabolite, N-desethyl sunitinib (SU12662), in human plasma: Application to an explorative study

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.02.006

Keywords

Sunitinib; N-desethyl sunitinib; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors; LC-MS/MS analysis; Tandem mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive, precise and accurate quantitative liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the measurement of sunitinib (SU11248) and N-desethyl sunitinib (SU12662) in human plasma was developed and validated. All sample handling was done under strict light protection. The sample preparation method employed acetonitrile protein precipitation using d(5)-SU11248 as an internal standard. The processed samples were chromatographed on a polymeric reversed-phase analytical column and analyzed by triple-quadrupole MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using positive TurbolonSpray (R) (TISP). The LC-MS/MS method described in this paper presents high absolute recovery (86.2% SU11248, 84.8% SU12662), high sensitivity (lower limit of quantitation of 0.06 ng/mL for both analytes), high inter-day precision (1.6-6.1% SU11248, 1.1-5.3% SU12662) and high analytical recovery (99.8-109.1% SU11248, 99.9-106.2% SU12662), as well as excellent linearity over the concentration range 0.060-100 ng/mL (r(2) > 0.999) with a short runtime of only 4.0 min. Results on the stability of SU11248 and SU12662 in human plasma are presented. During validation plasma from intensive care patients receiving many drugs were tested for interference and incurred samples were analyzed. The method met all criteria of the EMA and FDA guidelines during validation and was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in healthy human volunteers. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available