4.5 Article

A quantitative LC-MS/MS method for comparative analysis of capture-antibody affinity toward protein antigens

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.07.037

Keywords

Immunoassay; Mass spectrometry; Isotope dilution; Antibody; Troponin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mass spectrometry-based antibody selection procedure was developed to evaluate optimal 'capture' monoclonal antibodies that can be used in a variety of analytical measurement applications. The isotopedilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) methodology is based on the use of multiple-reaction monitoring of tryptic peptide fragments derived from protein antigens. A panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) was evaluated based on a quantitative determination of relative binding affinity to human cardiac troponin I following immunoprecipitation. Dissociation constants (K-d) were determined for 'bound mAb-antigen' vs. 'unbound antigen' using non-linear regression analysis. Relative quantification of both antigen and antibody was based on the use of stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides as internal standards. Optimal 'capture' mAbs were determined through evaluation of relative K-d constants of all monitored peptide transitions. A panel of six pre-screened candidate capture mAbs was concluded to consist of two subsets of mAbs, each with statistically equivalent K-d constants as determined using NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2921 - Human Cardiac Troponin Complex. This ID LC-MS/MS method is shown to be capable of quantitatively differentiating mAbs based on relative binding affinities. Selection of optimal capture mAbs can be applied toward a number of analytical applications which require metrological traceability and unbiased quantification. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available