4.5 Article

Quantification of dialkylphosphate metabolites of organophosphorus insecticides in human urine using 96-well plate sample preparation and high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.04.027

Keywords

Dialkylphosphate; DAPs; Organophosphorus metabolites; HPLC; Tandem mass spectrometry; Electrospray ionization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides kill by disrupting a targeted pest's brain and nervous systems. But if humans and other animals are sufficiently exposed. OP pesticides can have the same effect on them. We developed a fast and accurate high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitative measurement of the following six common dialkylphosphate (DAP) metabolites of organophosphorus insecticides: dimethylphosphate (DMP), dimethylthiophosphate (DMTP), dimethyldithiophosphate (DMDTP), diethylphosphate, (DEP), diethylthiophosphate (DETP), and diethyldithiophosphate (DEDTP). The general sample preparation included 96-well plate solid phase extraction using weak anion exchange cartridges. The analytical separation was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a HILIC column. Detection involved a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with an ESI probe in negative ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring. Repeated analyses of urine samples spiked at 150.90 and 32 ng/mL with the analytes gave relative standard deviations of less than 22%. The extraction efficiency ranged from 40% to 98%. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.04-1.5 ng/mL. The throughput is 1152 samples per week, effectively quadrupling our previous throughput. The method is safe, quick, and sensitive enough to be used in environmental and emergency biological monitoring of occupational and nonoccupational exposure to organophosphates. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available