4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

High-sensitivity analysis of anionic sulfonamides by capillary electrophoresis using a synergistic stacking approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1349, Issue -, Pages 129-134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.05.007

Keywords

Field-enhanced sample injection; Micelle-to-solvent stacking; Sulfonamides; Capillary zone electrophoresis; Successive multiple ionic-polymer layer; River water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A synergistic stacking approach whereby field-enhanced sample injection and micelle-to-solvent stacking in capillary zone electrophoresis are combined has been developed and has been applied to the separation and quantification of anionic sulfonamides. Electrokinetic injection of the sample in a low conductivity alkaline diluent was performed for 90s at -15 kV. Micelle-to-solvent stacking was then undertaken by hydrodynamic injection of micellar cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solution prior to the electrokinetic injection of sample that also contained 50% methanol. This combined stacking approach, when compared to a typical hydrostatic injection, provided improvements in peak height and corrected peak area in the range of 397-1024 and 758-1246, respectively. Limits of quantification in the range of 0.01-0.03 mu g/mL were obtained for sulfamerazine, sulfamethazine and sulfamethizole and were sufficient for the determination of these analytes in river water. The percentage recovery and accuracy values obtained for a fortified river water sample that had been subjected to sample preparation by evaporation and reconstitution with diluent were 74-135%. Intra-day and inter-day repeatabilities for migration time, peak height, and corrected peak area were in the range 0.5-5.0% (percentage relative standard deviation, n=8) and these relatively low values were attributed to the use of a stable capillary coating established by the successive multiple ionic-polymer layer technique. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available