4.6 Article

Interaction evaluation of bacteria and protoplasts with single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid library based on capillary electrophoresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1358, Issue -, Pages 269-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.079

Keywords

Bacteria; Protoplasts; Aptamers selection; ssDNA; Interaction; Capillary electrophoresis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21175011, 21375008]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2012CB910603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For whole-cell aptamers selection, cells surface situation has great impact on single-stranded (ssDNA) binding and aptamers selection. In this work, both Lactobacillus acidophilus and Escherichia coli as well as their protoplasts were as cells targets, their interaction with ssDNA library were evaluated based on capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE) with UV and LIF detection. Our results demonstrated that protoplasts without cells wall had apparently stronger interaction with ssDNA library than bacteria, the protoplasts-ssDNA complex could be observed clearly with CZE-LIF. Furthermore, E. coli pretreated by four organic solvents (methanol, ethanol, formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde) showed binding difference with ssDNA library, which could be identified with ACE-UV. Binding constants indicated the interaction of E. coli with ssDNA library were in the order of E. coli protoplasts > methanol (ethanol) treated E. coli > formaldehyde (glutaraldehyde) treated E. coli approximate to E. coli. Above results suggest that cells surface situation determines their binding affinity with ssDNA, which should be considered in whole-cell aptamers selection and aptamers further application. Capillary electrophoresis is a preferable technique for interaction evaluation of composite targets binding with ssDNA library. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available