4.6 Article

Microextraction by packed sorbent coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: A comparison between draw-eject and extract-discard methods under equilibrium conditions for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1371, Issue -, Pages 30-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.062

Keywords

Microextraction by packed sorbent; Mathematical model; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Water analysis; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. STAR*AgroEnergy Project of the University of Foggia, Italy
  2. European Commission, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [Regpot 2011-1, 286269]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, two different extraction procedures for the analysis of different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water by microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) have been compared in terms of sensitivity, reliability and time of analysis. The first method, called draw-eject, consists of a sequence of cycles of aspirations and injections in the same vial; the second one, called extract-discard, consists of a similar cycle sequence, but the aspired sample in this case is discarded into waste. The relevant partition equilibriums and extraction rates have been calculated by multivariate regression from the data obtained after MEPS gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (MEPS-GC-MS) analysis of 16 PAHs from water samples. Partitioning parameters for a priori prediction of solute sorption equilibrium, recoveries and preconcentration effects in aqueous and solvent systems have been calculated and compared for the two extraction procedures. Finally, real samples from sea, agricultural irrigation wells, streams and tap water were analyzed. Detection (S/N >= 3) and quantification (S/N >= 10) limits were calculated for the extraction processes. Under the experimental conditions used for the draw-eject procedure, these values were in the range 0.5-2 ng L-1 and 1.6-6.2 ng L-1, while for the extract-discard procedure they ranged from 0,2 to 0.8 ng L-1 and from 0.8 to 2.0 ng L-1, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available