4.6 Article

Effervescence assisted on-site liquid phase microextraction for the determination of five triazine herbicides in water

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1371, Issue -, Pages 58-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.068

Keywords

Effervescent tablet; On-site liquid phase microextraction; Triazine herbicides; Water

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307155, 21337005, J1210064]
  2. Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project [YEPT0323]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel effervescence assisted on-site liquid phase microextraction has been developed for the determination of five triazine herbicides in water. The use of an effervescent tablet composed of citric acid, sodium bicarbonate and 1-undecanol (extraction solvent) was the core of the method. The triazine herbicides in water were extracted by 1-undecanol released from tablet under effervescence and determined by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometer. The experimental variables, including NaCl concentration, temperature, weight of effervescent tablet, volume of extraction solvent and pH value, were screened by a Plackett-Burman design and optimized by a Box-Behnken design. Under the optimized conditions, good linearity was obtained in the range of 0.05-10 mu g L-1 with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.9936 to 0.9988. The limits of quantification were between 7.6 and 26.4 ng L-1, and the recoveries were in 71.4-93.2% with relative standard deviations of 2.5-10.9%. This method, which does not require centrifugation and any special apparatus, was successfully applied to determine triazine herbicides in real waters, promising to be a way to speed field sampling procedures for the organic pollutants monitoring in water. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available