4.6 Article

Combined use of chiral ionic liquid surfactants and neutral cyclodextrins: Evaluation of ionic liquid head groups for enantioseparation of neutral compounds in capillary electrophoresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1360, Issue -, Pages 296-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.047

Keywords

Enantioseparation; Capillary electrophoresis; Neutral compounds; Ionic liquids type surfactants; 2,3,6-Tri-O-methyl-beta-cyclodextrin

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM-062314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are most commonly used chiral selectors in capillary electrophoresis (CE). Although the use of neutral CDs and its derivatives have shown to resolve plethora of charged enantiomers, they cannot resolve neutral enantiomers. The use of ionic liquids (ILs) surfactants forming successful complex with CDs present itself an opportunity to resolve neutral enantiomers. In this work, the effect of IL head groups and their complexation ability with heptakis (2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-beta-cyclodextrin (TM-beta-CD) was studied for the separation of neutral enantiomers by CE. First, cationic IL type surfactants with different chiral head groups were synthesized. Physicochemical properties such as critical micelle concentration were determined by surface tension, whereas aggregation and polarity were determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. The complexation ability of ILs with TM-beta-CD was characterized in the gas phase by CE-mass spectrometry. The influence of the type of ILs head group and its concentration on chiral resolution, resolution per unit time and selectivity were investigated for four structurally diverse neutral compounds. The binding constants of the neutral analytes to the IL-CD complex were estimated by y-reciprocal method. The hydrophobicity of the side chain of the IL head group displayed significant effect on the binding constants and enantioseparations. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available