4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of 12 β-agonists in feeds by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1278, Issue -, Pages 82-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.060

Keywords

Quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; beta-Agonists; Feeds; Ultra-performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. public welfare project of AQSIQ [201310134]
  2. National Research Program of China [2009BADB9B02]
  3. project of CAIQ [2012JK31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new analysis method using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q/TOF MS) was developed for screening and confirmation of 12 beta-agonists in feeds. Under the optimized gradient elution conditions, it takes only 6 min to separate all 12 beta-agonists, and the critical pair of Ractopamine and Isoxsuprine isomers was almost completely separated. Based on the over 10,000 full-width at half maximum (FWHM) mass resolution and high mass accuracy features of TOF MS with 20 mDa mass window, accurate mass chromatograms were reconstructed for individual compounds. The fragmentation pathways of 12 beta-agonists were also studied using Q-TOF MS. The potential of UPLC-Q/TOF MS for confirmatory analysis was shown by determining the accurate mass of all compounds and fragment ions upon collision-induced-dissociation (CID) at different energies. The extra mass measurement errors for all beta-agonists were found to be within 5 ppm. The limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantitation (LOQs) were determined for all beta-agonists in feeds and found to be 1-5 ng/mL and 5-50 mu g/kg, respectively. The method of UPLC-Q/TOF MS developed in this study was initially applied to the research of feeds for analysis of 12 beta-agonists and proved to be accurate, sensitive, convenient and practical. Crown Copyright (c) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available