4.6 Article

A re-investigation of the Mark-Houwink-Sakurada parameters for cellulose in Cuen: A study based on size-exclusion chromatography combined with multi-angle light scattering and viscometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1281, Issue -, Pages 32-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.01.038

Keywords

Cellulose; SEC-MALLS; MHS equation; Cuen; Viscosity average DP; Specific refractive index increment

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council [173142/30]
  2. Hafslund Nett
  3. Statnett SF
  4. Statkraft Energi AS
  5. Norsk Hydro
  6. EDF
  7. Nynas AB
  8. ABB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The MHS parameters for cellulose in Cuen (0.5 M) were calculated by determining the weight (DPw), number (DPn), and the viscosity average (DPv) of partially hydrolysed celluloses using SEC-MALLS in DMAc containing 0.5% LiCl, combined with intrinsic viscosity measurements in Cuen. The modified MHS equation is: [eta] = 2.45DP(v)(0.70) = 0.070M(v)(0.70). Application of the equation provides the true viscosity average DP (DPv) for any type of distribution. In contrast, the apparent 'DPv' referred to in standard methods (ASTM, SCAN) is an undefined type of average DP which depends on the chain length distribution, and may differ considerably from both DPv and DPw. The DP values obtained by SEC-MALLS depend on the quality of the data, in particular the specific refractive index increment at constant chemical potential (dn/dc)(mu), which was found to be 0.117 ml/g (at lambda(0) = 633 nm). Further analysis of the SEC-MALLS and viscometry data in terms of the wormlike chain model provided estimates of the persistence length, obtaining 4.7 nm in Cuen and 8.2 nm in 0.5% DMAc/LiCl, illustrating the more expanded structure in the latter solvent. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available