4.6 Article

Solid-phase microextraction of phthalate esters from aqueous media by electrophoretically deposited TiO2 nanoparticles on a stainless steel fiber

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1283, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.01.092

Keywords

Electrophoretic deposition process; Titanium dioxide nanoparticles; Phthalate esters; Solid phase microextraction; Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

Funding

  1. Shahid Beheshti University Research Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel SPME fiber was prepared by electrophoretic deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) on a stainless steel wire. It was used in the direct immersion solid-phase microextraction (DI-SPME) of four phthalate esters from aqueous samples prior to gas chromatographic (GC) analysis. The effects of various parameters on the efficiency of the SPME process such as the mode of extraction, extraction temperature, film thickness of the SPME fiber, salt content, extraction time and stirring rate were investigated. The comparison of the fiber with another homemade poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-TiO2 (PEDOT-TiO2) nanocomposite fiber and a commercial polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber showed the better extraction efficiency of the nano-TiO2 fiber for phthalate esters. Under optimized conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) for the phthalate esters varied between 0.05 and 0.12 mu g L-1. The inter-day and intra-day relative standard deviations for various phthalate esters at 10 mu g L-1 concentration level (n = 6) using a single fiber were 6.6-7.5% and 8.3-11.1%, respectively. The fiber to fiber repeatabilities (n = 4), expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD%), were between 8.9% and 10.2% at 10 mu g L-1 concentration level. The linear ranges varied between 0.5 and 1000 mu g L-1. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of the bottled mineral water sample with recoveries from 86 to 107%. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available