4.6 Article

Investigation of the axial heterogeneity of the retention factor of carbamazepine along an supercritical fluid chromatography column. I - Linear conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1306, Issue -, Pages 89-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.06.081

Keywords

Supercritical fluid chromatography; System axial heterogeneity; Apparent retention factor; True retention factor; Carbamazepine

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1108681]
  2. Waters Technologies Corporation
  3. University of Tennessee
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The retention behavior of carbamazepine eluted in SFC was studied by changing the back pressure between 100 and 200 bar and the volumetric flow rate between 0.5 and 5 mL/min. Carbamazepine was eluted under linear conditions from a silica column with 90:10% (V/V) mixtures of supercritical carbon dioxide and methanol at 310 K. The retention factor of carbamazepine decreases by 20% when the pressure drop along the column increases from 1 to 28 bar and the outlet pressure increases from 100 to 200 bar. The variation of the retention factor at low pressure drops (below 15 bar) is negligible (a few percent) but it is significant (exceeding 20%) for pressure drops larger than 15 bar. Under these latter conditions, the variation of the equilibrium constant along the column is significant at high pressure drops. Because the adsorption parameters depend on the local pressure, the extension of dynamic methods from LC to SFC should be made cautiously for the determination of adsorption isotherms. Our results suggest that the flow rate applied during the course of dynamic method measurements should be kept small. The determination of the adsorption parameters from measurements carried out at high flow rates might not be as accurate as it is when the column is axially uniform. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available