4.6 Article

Novel double-confined polymeric ionic liquids as sorbents for solid-phase microextraction with enhanced stability and durability in high-ionic-strength solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1268, Issue -, Pages 16-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.037

Keywords

Copolymerization; Double confined; Polymeric ionic liquids; Direct immersion solid-phase; microextraction; Gas chromatography

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21175143]
  2. National Science & Technology Major Project of China [2008ZX05010, 2008ZX05011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the occurrence of ion exchange between high-ionic-strength solution and anions of polymeric ionic liquids (PILs), PILs based solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers were rarely used in direct immersion mode to high-salt-added samples. In this work, a novel double-confined PIL sorbent was prepared by co-polymerization of cation and anion of 1-vinyl-3-octylimidzaolium p-styrenesulfonate (VOlm(+)SS(-)). The poly(VOlm(+)-SS-) was chemically bonded onto functionalized stainless steel wire via surface radical chain-transfer reaction. Stability of poly(VOlm(+)-SS-) in high-ionic-strength solution was investigated and compared with that of poly(1-vinyl-3-octylimidzaolium benzenesulfonate) (poly(VOlm(+)BS(-))) by elemental analysis of sulfur element, and results turned out that the poly(VOlm(+)-SS-) was more stable. Coupled to gas chromatography (GC), the poly(VOlm(+)-SS-) fiber was used to extract three sorts of compounds including anilines, phenols and phthalate esters in aqueous solution. The as-established method showed good linearity, low detection limits, and acceptable repeatability. The direct immersion SPME-GC method was applied to determine the model phthalate esters in bottled mineral water. The determination results were satisfactory. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available