4.6 Article

Effervescence-assisted dispersive micro-solid phase extraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1218, Issue 51, Pages 9128-9134

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.042

Keywords

Dispersive micro-solid phase extraction; Effervescence; Nitroaromatic compounds

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTQ2007-60426]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2009-2850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extraction techniques are surface dependent processes since their kinetic directly depends on the contact area between the sample and the extractant phase. The dispersion of the extractant (liquid or solid) increases this area improving the extraction efficiency. In this article, the dispersion of the sorbent at the very low milligram level is achieved by effervescence thanks to the in situ generation of carbon dioxide. For this purpose a special tablet containing the effervescence precursors (sodium carbonate as carbon dioxide source and sodium dihydrogen phosphate as proton donor) and the sorbent (OASIS-HLB) is fabricated. All the microextraction process takes place in a 10 mL-glass syringe and the solid, enriched with the extracted analytes, is recovered by filtration. Acetonitrile was selected to elute the retained analytes. The extraction mode is characterized and optimized using the determination of five nitroaromatic compounds in water. The absolute recoveries of the analytes were in the range 61-85% while relative recoveries close to 100% in all cases, which demonstrates the absence of matrix effect on the extraction. These values permit the determination of these analytes at the microgram per liter range with good precision (relative standard deviations lower than 6.1%) using ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) combined with ultraviolet (UV) detection as instrumental technique. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available