4.6 Article

Brand-dependent volatile fingerprinting of Italian wines from Valpolicella

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1218, Issue 42, Pages 7557-7565

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.042

Keywords

Aromatic profile; Wine; Withering; HS-SPME/GC-MS; One-way ANOVA analysis

Funding

  1. Cantine Trabucchi, Illasi (Verona, Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry was developed and applied to obtain the volatile aromatic fingerprints of three typical Italian wines, Valpolicella, Amarone and Recioto, all produced in the restricted geographical area of Valpolicella (Veneto, Italy) with the same grape cultivars within the regulations of a rigid disciplinary of production. Differences between the three typologies are mainly linked to the different withering times to which grapes are subjected before vinification, which strongly influences the concentration and the development of volatile aroma compounds. A total of 22 different wines (7 Valpolicella, 10 Amarone and 5 Recioto) were characterised in terms of aromatic volatile profile with the aim to distinguish the different products and to evaluate the possibility to differentiate the same product from different brands. For the chemometric evaluation of the data one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were tested. All the chemometric tools employed allow to differentiate between the three products. More intriguing is the ability of the chemometric approach to differentiate between the same product (Amarone, Recioto) from different winery, thus showing the potential of this approach to characterize the brand-dependent typicality of wines, which is usually related to subtle technological differences which nevertheless have strong influences on the organoleptic characteristics of the products. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available