4.6 Article

Contributions to reversed-phase column selectivity. I. Steric interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1218, Issue 13, Pages 1724-1742

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.047

Keywords

Hydrophobic-subtraction; Steric interaction; Shape selectivity; Column selectivity; Retention mechanism; HPLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In reversed-phase chromatography (RPC), the restricted retention of bulky solutes can occur in one of two ways, giving rise to either shape selectivity or steric interaction. Starting with data for 150 solutes and 167 monomeric type-B alkylsilica columns, the present study examines the steric interaction process further and compares it with shape selectivity. The dependence of column hydrophobicity and steric interaction on column properties (ligand length and concentration, pore diameter, end-capping) was determined and compared. The role of the solute in steric interaction was found to be primarily a function of solute molecular length, with longer solutes giving increased steric interaction. We find that there are several distinct differences in the way shape selectivity and steric interaction are affected by separation conditions and the nature of the sample. Of particular interest, steric interaction exhibits a maximum effect for monomeric C-18 columns, and becomes less important for either a C-1 or C-30 column; shape selectivity appears unimportant for monomeric C-1-C-18 columns at ambient and higher temperatures, but becomes pronounced for C-30 as well as polymeric columns with ligands >= C-8. One hypothesis is that shape selectivity involves the presence or creation of cavities within the stationary phase that can accommodate a retained solute (a primarily enthalpic process), while steric interaction mainly makes greater use of spaces that pre-exist the retention of the solute (a primarily entropic process). The related dependence of hydrophobic interaction on column properties was also examined. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available