4.6 Article

Effect of first dimension phase selectivity in online comprehensive two dimensional liquid chromatography (LC x LC)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1218, Issue 38, Pages 6675-6687

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.063

Keywords

Two dimensional liquid chromatography; Selectivity; Reversed phase; LC x LC method development; Hydrophobic subtraction method; Carbon stationary phases

Funding

  1. NIH [GM 054585]
  2. NSF [CHE-0911516]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [0911516] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we examined the effect of first dimension column selectivity in reversed phase (RP) online comprehensive two dimensional liquid chromatography (LC x LC). The second dimension was always a carbon clad metal oxide reversed phase material. The hydrophobic subtraction model (HSM) and the related phase selective triangles were used to guide the selection of six different RP first dimension columns. Various kinds of samples were investigated and thus two different elution conditions were needed to cause full elution from the first dimension columns. We compared LC x LC chromatograms, contours plots, and f(coverage) plots by measuring peak capacities, peak numbers, relative spatial coverage, correlation values, etc. The major finding of this study is that the carbon phase due to its rather different selectivity from other reversed phases is reasonably orthogonal to a variety of common types of bonded reversed phases. Thus quite surprisingly the six different first dimension stationary phases all showed generally similar separation patterns when paired to the second dimension carbon phase. This result greatly simplifies the task of choosing the correct pair of phases for RP x RP. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available