4.6 Article

The performance of hybrid monolithic silica capillary columns prepared by changing feed ratios of tetramethoxysilane and methyltrimethoxysilane

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1217, Issue 1, Pages 89-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.019

Keywords

Monolithic silica column; High column efficiency; Methyltrimethoxysilane; Permeability; Selectivity; Size exclusion chromatography

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology [17350036, 20350036]
  2. JLU Giessen
  3. Nacalai-Tesque
  4. GL Sciences
  5. Merck KGaA
  6. Darmstadt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of a feed ratio of methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS) to tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) was studied to improve the performance of a hybrid monolithic silica capillary column with 100-mu m i.d. in HPLC in a range MTMS/TMOS (v/v) = 10/90-25/75. The domain size was also varied by adjusting the amount of PEG to control permeability (K = 2.8 x 10(-14)-6.9 x 10(-14) m(2)). Evaluation of the performance for those capillary columns following octadecylsilylation proved an increase in retention factor (k) and a decrease in steric selectivity alpha(triphenylene/ortho-terphenyl) with the increase in MTMS content in the feed. The effect of the feed ratio was also observed in porosity and hydrophobic property of the C18 stationary phase from the results of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and reversed phase characterization. The monolithic silica capillary columns prepared under new preparation conditions were able to produce a plate height of 4.6-6.0 mu m for hexylbenzene in a mobile phase acetonitrile/water=80/20 at a linear velocity of 2mm/s. Consequently, it was possible to prepare hybrid monolithic silica capillary columns with higher performance than those reported previously while maintaining the retention factors in a similar range by reducing the MTMS/TMOS ratio and increasing the total silane concentration in feed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available