4.6 Article

Preconcentration sensitive determination of pyrethroid insecticides in environmental water samples with solid phase extraction with SiO2 microspheres cartridge prior to high performance liquid chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1217, Issue 31, Pages 5021-5025

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.05.060

Keywords

SiO2 microspheres; Fenpropathrin; Cyhalothrin; Fenvalevate; Biphenthrin; High performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. High-Tech Research & Development Planning (863 Plan) of P.R. China [2006AA06Z424]
  2. Personal Innovation Foundation of Universities in Henan Province
  3. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KF2009-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Present study developed a new method for the sensitive determination of pyrethroid insecticides with solid phase extraction in combination with high performance liquid chromatography and UV detector. SiO2 microspheres, a new SiO2 based material, was investigated for the enrichment ability and applicability as the solid phase extraction sorbent. Four pyrethroid pesticides such as fenpropathrin, cyhalothrin, fenvalevate and biphenthrin were used as the target analytes. Parameters that maybe influence the extraction efficiency such as the eluent type and its volume, sample flow rate, sample pH, and the sample volume were optimized in detail, and the optimal conditions were as followed: sample volume. 100 mL; concentration of methanol, 30%; acetone volume, 5 mL; sample flow rate, 4.2 mL min(-1); sample pH, 7. The experimental results indicated that there was good linearity in the concentration range of 0.1-50 mu g L-1 except biphenthrin in the range of 0.05-25 mu g L-1. The detection limits for fenpropathrin, cyhalothrin, fenvalevate and biphenthrin were in the range of 0.02-0.08 mu g L-1. The intra-day and day to day precisions (RSDs, n = 6) were in the ranges of 2.6-4.4% and 5.3-7.2%, respectively. The method was validated with five real environmental water samples, and all these results proved that proposed method could be used as a good alternative for the routine analysis for such pollutants in environmental samples. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available