4.6 Article

Determination of octylphenol and nonylphenol in aqueous sample using simultaneous derivatization and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1217, Issue 43, Pages 6762-6768

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.06.030

Keywords

Derivatization; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME); Methyl chloroformate; Endocrine disrupting alkylphenols; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [20977116]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [0090171110041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and fast sample preparation method for the determination of nonylphenol (NP) and octylphenol (OP) in aqueous samples by simultaneous derivatization and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was investigated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) In this method, a combined dispersant/derivatization catalyst (methanol/pyridine mixture) was firstly added to an aqueous sample, following which a derivatization reagent/extraction solvent (methyl chloroformate/chloroform) was rapidly injected to combine in situ derivatization and extraction in a single step After centrifuging, the sedimented phase containing the analytes was injected into the GC port by autosampler for analysis. Several parameters, such as extraction solvent, dispersant solvent, amount of derivatization reagent, derivatization and extraction time, pH, and ionic strength were optimized to obtain higher sensitivity for the detection of NP and OP. Under the optimized conditions', good linearity was observed in the range of 0 1-1000 mu g L-1 and 0 01-100 mu g L-1 with the limits of detection (LOD)of 0.03 mu g L-1 and 0 002 mu g L-1 for NP and OP, respectively. Water samples collected from the Pearl River were analyzed with the proposed method, the concentrations of NP and OP were found to be 2.40 +/- 0 16 mu g L-1 and 0.037 +/- 0 001 mu g L-1, respectively. The relative recoveries of the water samples spiked with different concentrations of NP and OP were in the range of 88 3-106.7%. Compared with SPME and SPE, the proposed method can be successfully applied to the rapid and convenient determination of NP and OP in aqueous samples (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available