4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of five flavonoids in licorice using pressurized liquid extraction and capillary electrochromatography coupled with peak suppression diode array detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 43, Pages 7329-7335

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.034

Keywords

Licorice; Flavonoids; Pressurized liquid extraction; Capillary electrochromatography; Peak suppression

Funding

  1. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund [04912005/A-R1]
  2. University of Macau [UL015/09-Y1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) methods were developed for the simultaneous determination of five flavonoids, namely liquiritin, isoliquiritin, ononin, liquiritigenin and isoliquiritigenin, in licorice using baicalein as internal standard (IS). Peak suppression technique was used for the quantification of ononin because of its poor resolution with isoliquiritin. The analysis was performed on a Hypersil C-18 capillary (3 mu m, 100 mu m/25 cm) with a mixture of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 3.0)/ACN (65:35, v/v) as mobile phase running at 25 W and 30 degrees C. The detection wavelengths were set at 275 nm (without reference wavelength for liquiritin and liquiritigenin), 360 nm (without reference wavelength for isoliquiritin and isoliquiritigenin) and 254 nm (with reference wavelength of 405 nm for ononin). All calibration curves showed good linearity (R-2 > 0.9993) within the test ranges. The LOD and LOQ were lower than 2.1 and 8.3 mu g/mL, respectively. The RSDs of intra- and interday for relative peak areas of five analytes to IS were less than 3.8 and 4.7%, respectively, and the recoveries were 98.2-103.8%. The validated method was successfully applied to the quantitative analysis of five flavonoids in licorice, which is helpful to its quality control. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available