4.4 Review

What Twin Studies Tell Us About the Heritability of Brain Development, Morphology, and Function: A Review

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 27-46

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-015-9278-9

Keywords

Twins; Genetics; Cortex; Magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]; Brain

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific research (NWO Brain Cognition) [433-09-228]
  2. Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of brain structure and function shows large inter-individual variation. The extent to which this variation is due to genetic or environmental influences has been investigated in twin studies using structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The current review presents an overview of twin studies using MRI in children, adults and elderly, and focuses on cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. The majority of the investigated brain measures are heritable to a large extent (60-80 %), although spatial differences in heritability are observed as well. Cross-sectional studies suggest that heritability estimates slightly increase from childhood to adulthood. Long-term longitudinal studies are better suited to study developmental changes in heritability, but these studies are limited. Results so far suggest that the heritability of change over time is relatively low or absent, but more studies are needed to confirm these findings. Compared to brain structure, twin studies of brain function are scarce, and show much lower heritability estimates (similar to 40 %). The insights from heritability studies aid our understanding of individual differences in brain structure and function. With the recent start of large genetic MRI consortia, the chance of finding genes that explain the heritability of brain morphology increases. Gene identification may provide insight in biological mechanisms involved in brain processes, which in turn will learn us more about healthy and disturbed brain functioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available