4.6 Article

High extraction efficiency for polar aromatic compounds in natural water samples using multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Nafion solid-phase microextraction coating

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 52, Pages 9143-9148

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.025

Keywords

Solid-phase microextraction; Multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Nafion coated fiber; Gas chromatography; Polar aromatic compounds

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB732402]
  2. Science and Technology Projects of Fujian Province [2007Y0032]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20775064]
  4. NFFTBS [J0630429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/Nafion was developed and applied for the extraction of polar aromatic compounds (PACs) in natural water samples. The characteristics and the application of this fiber were investigated. Electron microscope photographs indicated that the MWCNTs/Nafion coating with average thickness of 12.5 mu m was homogeneous and porous. The MWCNTs/Nafion coated fiber exhibited higher extraction efficiency towards polar aromatic Compounds compared to an 85 mu m commercial PA fiber. SPME experimental conditions, such as fiber coating, extraction time, stirring rate, desorption temperature and desorption time, were optimized in order to improve the extraction efficiency. The calibration curves were linear from 0.01 to 10 mu g mL(-1) for five PACs studied except p-nitroaniline (from 0.005 to 10 mu g mL(-1)) and m-cresol (from 0.001 to 10 mu g mL(-1)), and detection limits were within the range of 0.03-0.57 ng mL(-1). Single fiber and fiber-to-fiber reproducibility were less than 7.5 (n = 7) and 10.0% (n = 5), respectively. The recovery of the PACs spiked in natural water samples at 1 mu g mL(-1) ranged from 83.3 to 106.0%. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available