4.6 Article

Gas flow headspace liquid phase microextraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 45, Pages 7694-7699

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.039

Keywords

LPME; Headspace; Enrichment; Ideal gas; PAHs; Gas flow

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20767006]
  2. Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [200801840002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a trend towards the use of enrichment techniques such as microextraction in the analysis of trace chemicals. Based on the theory of ideal gases, theory of gas chromatography and the original headspace liquid phase microextraction (HS-LPME) technique, a simple gas flow headspace liquid phase microextraction (GF-HS-LPME) technique has been developed, where the extracting gas phase volume is increased using a gas flow. The system is an open system, where an inert gas containing the target compounds flows continuously through a special gas outlet channel (D = 1.8 mm), and the target compounds are trapped on a solvent microdrop (2.4 mu L) hanging on the microsyringe tip, as a result, a high enrichment factor is obtained. The parameters affecting the enrichment factor, such as the gas flow rate, the position of the microdrop, the diameter of the gas outlet channel, the temperatures of the extracting solvent and of the sample, and the extraction time, were systematically optimized for four types of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The results were compared with results obtained from HS-LPME. Under the optimized conditions (where the extraction time and the volume of the extracting sample vial were fixed at 20 min and 10 mL, respectively), detection limits (S/N = 3) were approximately a factor of 4 lower than those for the original HS-LPME technique. The method was validated by comparison of the GF-HS-LPME and HS-LPME techniques using data for PAHs from environmental sediment samples. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available