4.6 Review

Foundations of retention in partition chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 10, Pages 1530-1550

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.092

Keywords

Gas-liquid chromatography; Liquid chromatography; Supercritical fluid chromatography; Micellar electrokinetic chromatography; Capillary electrochromatography; Retention mechanisms; Retention factor; Specific retention volume; Retenion index; Column hold-up volume; Interfacial adsorption; Isotherms; Programmed separations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The connection between the observable output in column chromatography (retention time, retention volume, retention factor, separation factor, etc.) and system properties (hold-up volume, pressure, temperature, isotherm behavior, etc.) is discussed from a practical and mechanistic perspective for gas-liquid chromatography, reversed-phase liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography, micellar electrokinetic chromatography, and capillary electrochromatography. The unifying feature of these techniques is that retention can be described by a partition model, although not always exclusively. When over simplistic system models are used to explain variation in retention parameters they frequently mask the true reasons for poor repeatability and difficulties in transfer between system. Methods employing relative retention afford higher precision but may contain residual uncorrected errors. For those systems with several separate mechanisms contributing to retention the effective retention parameters can no longer be interpreted by simple partition models. The broadly based and practically focused material in this article affords an illustration of the often complicated relationship between system properties and retention, and the dangers that lurk in simplified retention models if the validity of their underlining approximations is not appropriate for the system under study. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available