4.6 Article

Gravitational field-flow fractionation of human hemopoietic stem cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 52, Pages 9081-9087

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.024

Keywords

Gravitational field-flow fractionation; Cell sorting; Hematopoietic stem cells

Funding

  1. MIUR (Ministero Italiano dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New cell sorting methodologies, which are simple, fast, non-invasive, and able to isolate homogeneous cell Populations, are needed for applications ranging from gene expression analysis to cell-based therapy. In particular, in the forefront of stem cell isolation, progenitor cells have to be separated under mild experimental conditions from complex heterogeneous mixtures prepared from human tissues. Most of the methodologies now employed make use of immunological markers. However, it is widely acknowledged that specific markers for pluripotent stein cells are not as yet available, and cell labelling may interfere with the differentiation process. This work presents for the first time gravitational field-flow fractionation (GrFFF), as a tool for tag-less, direct selection of human hematopoietic stein and progenitor cells from cell samples obtained by peripheral blood aphaeresis. These cells are responsible to repopulate the hemopoietic system and they are used in transplantation therapies. Blood aphaeresis sample were injected into a GrFFF system and collected fractions were characterized by flow cytometry for CD34 and CD45 expression, and then tested for viability and multi-differentiation potential. The developed GrFFF method allowed obtaining high enrichment levels of viable, multi-potent hematopoietic stem cells in specific fraction and it showed to fulfil major requirements of analytical performance, such as selectivity and reproducibility of the fractionation process and high sample recovery. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available