4.6 Review

The analysis of Radix Angelicae Sinensis (Danggui)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 11, Pages 1991-2001

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.033

Keywords

Radix Angelicae Sinensis (Danggui); Phthalide; Organic acid; Polysaccharide; Chromatographic fingerprinting; Reviews

Funding

  1. International cooperation project on traditional Chinese medicines of ministry of science and technology of China [2006DFA41090, 2007DFA40680]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radix Angelicae Sinensis, known as Danggui in China, is one of the most popular traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), which is contained by more than 80 composite formulae. Modern researches indicate that phthalides, organic acids and their esters, polysaccharides are main chemical components related to the bioactivities and pharmacological properties of Danggui. Some of them, such as Z-ligustilide and ferulic acid, are selected as marker compounds to evaluate the quality of Danggui frequently. Because of the diversity of chemical structures and characters of these components, analytical methods of Danggui are various, Including CC-MS, HPLC-DAD-MS, TLC, CE-DAD, and so on. Besides that, the development of analytical technology makes the quality control of Danggui more effective and reliable. Quality evaluation is from single or several components' analysis to fingerprinting, or in combination. Furthermore, bioactive components screening of Danggui has also attracted Much attention, which will help Lis evaluate the selected marker components to some extent. In this paper, the literatures about the major phyroconstituents of Danggui, quality control and bioactive components screening methods have been reviewed. Main attention is given to the different methodologies developed to perform chemical analysis, including separation, detection and identification. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available