4.6 Article

Some solutions to obtain very efficient separations in isocratic and gradient modes using small particles size and ultra-high pressure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 15, Pages 3232-3243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.02.032

Keywords

UPLC; UHPLC; HTLC; Temperature; Gradient; Peak capacity; Very high resolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The U H PLC strategy which combines sub-2 mu m porous particles and ultra-high pressure (> 1000 bar) was investigated considering very high resolution criteria in both isocratic and gradient modes, with mobile phase temperatures between 30 and 90 degrees C. In isocratic mode, experimental conditions to reach the maximal efficiency were determined using the kinetic plot representation for Delta P-max = 1000 bar. It has been first confirmed that the molecularweight of the compounds (MW) was a critical parameter which should be considered in the construction of such curves. With a MW around 1000 g mol(-1), efficiencies as high as 300,000 plates could be theoretically attained using UHPLC at 30 degrees C. By limiting the column length to 450 mm, the maximal plate count was around 100,000. In gradient mode, the longest column does not provide the maximal peak capacity for a given analysis time in UHPLC. This was attributed to the fact that peak capacity is not only related to the plate number but also to column dead time. Therefore, a compromise should be found and a 150 min column should be preferentially selected for gradient lengths up to 60 min at 30 degrees C, while the columns coupled in series (3 x 150 min) were attractive only for t(grad) > 250 min. Compared to 30 degrees C, peak capacities were increased by about 20-30% for a constant gradient length at 90 degrees C and gradient time decreased by 2-fold for an identical peak capacity. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available