4.6 Article

Using micellar electrokinetic chromatography for the highly efficient preconcentration and separation of gold nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1216, Issue 12, Pages 2554-2559

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.004

Keywords

Au nanoparticles; Preconcentration; Micellar electrokinetic chromatography; Separation

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 97-2113-M-390-004-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we report the use of micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) for the highly efficient preconcentration and separation of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs). We used the reversed electrode polarity stacking mode (REPSM) of the MEKC system for the on-line enhancement and separation of the Au NPs. Several parameters had dramatic effects on the systems' performance, including the concentration of sodium clodecylsulfate (SIDS) surfactant, the presence of salts in the NP solution, the pH of the running electrolyte, and the temperature of the capillary. Under the optimized conditions [buffer: SDS (70 mM) and 3-cyclohexylamino-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPS; 10 mM) at pH 10.0; applied voltage: 20 W; operating temperature: 25 degrees C; additive: sodium clihydrogenphosphate (NaH(2)PO(4), 10 mM): REPSM strategy for sample preconcentration], the number of theoretical plates for the 5.3- and 40.1-nm-diameter Au NPs were 3000 and (an ultrahigh) 2.1 x 10(6), respectively; in addition, the detection sensitivities toward the Au NPs were enhanced ca. 20- and 380-fold, respectively, relative to those obtained using standard MEKC analysis conditions. Furthermore, monitoring the electropherograms using diode-array detection allowed us to identify and characterize the sizes of the separated NPs from their UV-vis spectra. Our findings suggest that MEKC is a highly efficient tool for both the preconcentration and separation of NPs. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available