4.6 Article

Trace analysis of quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics from wastewaters by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1214, Issue 1-2, Pages 100-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.090

Keywords

Quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics; Environmental analysis; Matrix effects; WCX cartridge cleanup; LC-ESI-MS/MS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20610103, 40632009]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2006DFA91130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry method, combined with solid-phase extraction and a weak cation exchange cartridge cleanup, was established for twenty quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (pipemidic acid, flerofloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, lomefloxacin, difloxacin, sarafloxacin, gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, moxifloxacin, cinoxacin, oxolinic acid, nalidixic acid, flumequine, and piromidic acid) in influent, effluent, and river waters. For the various water matrices considered, the overall recoveries were from 64% to 127% except for piromidic acid (27-33%), and no obvious matrix effect was observed. The method detection limits for the twenty target antibiotics in the influent, effluent, and surface water samples were 1.6-50 ng/L, 0.6-50 ng/L, and 0.8-50 ng/L, respectively. This method was applied to analyze residual quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in wastewater and surface water samples from Beijing, China. Eight antibiotics (12 (pipemidic acid)-1208 ng/L (ofloxacin)) were detected in wastewater, and seven (1.3 (lomefloxacin)-535 ng/L (ofloxacin)) were detected in surface water samples. Gatifloxacin, a 4th generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic, was detected for the first time in influent (111 ng/L), effluent (56 ng/L), and river water (16-42 ng/L). 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available