4.6 Article

Multiresidue determination of sulfonamides in chicken meat by polymer monolith microextraction and capillary zone electrophoresis with field-amplified sample stacking

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1205, Issue 1-2, Pages 163-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.017

Keywords

capillary zone electrophoresis; sulfonamides; poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolith microextraction; field-amplified sample stacking

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [20625516]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-05-0616]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [20621502]
  4. NSFC
  5. National Key Technologies RD Program [2006BAF07B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method based on poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) (MAA-EGDMA) monolith microextraction (PMME) and online preconcentration technique of field-amplified sample stacking (FASS) was proposed for sensitive capillary electrophoresis-ultraviolet (CE-UV) analysis of 12 sulfonamides (sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxypyridazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamerazine, sulfameter, sulfadoxine, sulfadimethoxine, sulfamonomethoxine sodium, sulfachlorpyridazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfamethizole, and sulfisoxazole) in chicken samples. The conditions of PMME were optimized for the improvement of extraction efficiency and reduction of the matrix interferences from chicken sample. The best separation was achieved within 15 min using a buffer of 100 mM phosphate electrolyte (pH 7.3) with temperature and voltage of 20 degrees C and 25 kV, respectively. By applying FASS, detection limits of 3.49-16.7 ng/g were achieved with satisfactory precision (RSD <= 13%) and recovery (96.3-104%) over a linear range of 50-1000 ng/g for most analytes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All Fights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available