4.2 Article

Determination of Pyrazole and Pyrrole Pesticides in Environmental Water Samples by Solid-Phase Extraction Using Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Adsorbent Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 380-384

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmu055

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21107057, 51078193]
  2. Taishan Scholar Construction Project Special Foundation [2010016010]
  3. Special Foundation of Central Financial Support to Local Colleges and Universities [201020029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A solid-phase extraction (SPE) method using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbent coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography was developed for the determination of four pyrazole and pyrrole pesticides (fenpyroximate, chlorfenapyr, fipronil and flusilazole) in environmental water samples. Several parameters, such as extraction adsorbent, elution solvent and volume and sample loading flow rate were optimized to obtain high SPE recoveries and extraction efficiency. The calibration curves for the pesticides extracted were linear in the range of 0.05-10 mu g L-1 for chlorfenapyr and fenpyroximate and 0.05-20 mu g L-1 for fipronil and flusilazole, with the correlation coefficients (r(2)) between 0.9966 and 0.9990. The method gave good precisions (relative standard deviation %) from 2.9 to 10.1% for real spiked samples from reservoir water and seawater; method recoveries ranged 92.2-105.9 and 98.5-103.9% for real spiked samples from reservoir water and seawater, respectively. Limits of detection (S/N = 3) for the method were determined to be 8-19 ng L-1. The optimized method was successfully applied to the determination of four pesticides of pyrazoles and pyrroles in real environmental water samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available