4.3 Article

Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin on Steroid Hormones in Men and Women

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages 202-211

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000381023

Keywords

Intranasal oxytocin; Humans; Men; Women; Salivary hormones; Cortisol; Progesterone; Testosterone; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent interest in the social and cognitive effects of intranasal oxytocin prompts a need for understanding its physiological effects in humans. Few studies have examined the effects of intranasal oxytocin on steroid hormones. Filling this gap is especially important given the evidence that steroid hormones participate in some of the same behavioral functions as oxytocin, e.g. in stress, processing of emotional stimuli, aggression, trust, empathy, and parental care. Methods: In randomized, double-blind experiments, we administered oxytocin (24 IU) or saline placebo to 97 healthy participants. Saliva samples were collected before and at several time points after the oxytocin/placebo administration to assess the levels of cortisol, progesterone, and testosterone. Results: Oxytocin had no effects on testosterone, progesterone, or cortisol in women or men. Conclusion: Acute intranasal oxytocin does not affect the levels of cortisol, testosterone or progesterone in humans, at least in the absence of a stressful context. These data suggest that acute oxytocin does not have a direct impact on the human hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal or hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axes under nonstressful circumstances. This knowledge helps rule out potential mechanisms for some of the effects of oxytocin in humans and adds to the generally limited body of knowledge on the basic physiological or psychological effects of intranasal oxytocin in human beings. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available