4.5 Article

Determination and comparison of the thermodynamic quantities of U(VI) complexation with aliphatic and aromatic di-carboxylic acids by calorimetry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 227-232

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.11.011

Keywords

Uranium(VI) complex; Dicarboxylic acid; Stability constant; Enthalpy; Calorimetry

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24760713] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermodynamic quantities (Delta G, Delta H, Delta S) of complex formation of U(VI) with three aliphatic di-carboxylic acids, i.e. oxydiacetic acid (ODA), thiodiacetic acid (TDA), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), and three aromatic di-carboxylic acids, i.e. 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDA), 2,5-thiophenedicarboxylic acid (TDCA) and dipicolinic acid (DPA) were determined by potentiometric titration and micro-calorimetric titration. The obtained thermodynamic quantities are compared with each other for the discussion of the effect of structural difference, i.e. aliphatic-and aromatic structure and types of central atom in the ligands on the complex formation thermodynamics. A clear tendency is observed in the complexation data between aliphatic-and aromatic ligands. The complexation of those aliphatic ligands are completely entropy driven, on the contrary, the enthalpy change is a certain driving force in the complexation of those aromatic ligands while entropy change also contributes to progress of the reaction. The Delta G, Delta H and Delta S of 1: 1 IDA complex show remarkable difference from those of glutaric acid (GA) complex, while those of ODA and TDA complex are almost equal to those of GA complex, which seems to be attributed to the difference of the coordination mode. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available