4.7 Article

Surprisal Metrics for Quantifying Perturbed Conformational Dynamics in Markov State Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 5716-5728

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct500827g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1412508, NSF-CNS-09-58854]
  2. National Science Foundation through Temple University
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1412508] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Markov state models (MSMs), which model conformational dynamics as a network of transitions between metastable states, have been increasingly used to model the thermodynamics and kinetics of biomolecules. In considering perturbations to molecular dynamics induced by sequence mutations, chemical modifications, or changes in external conditions, it is important to assess how transition rates change, independent of changes in metastable state definitions. Here, we present a surprisal metric to quantify the difference in metastable state transitions for two closely related MSMs, taking into account the statistical uncertainty in observed transition counts. We show that the surprisal is a relative entropy metric closely related to the Jensen-Shannon divergence between two MSMs, which can be used to identify conformational states most affected by perturbations. As examples, we apply the surprisal metric to a two-dimensional lattice model of a protein hairpin with mutations to hydrophobic residues, all-atom simulations of the Fs peptide alpha-helix with a salt-bridge mutation, and a comparison of protein G beta-hairpin with its trpzip4 variant. Moreover, we show that surprisal-based adaptive sampling is an efficient strategy to reduce the statistical uncertainty in the Jensen-Shannon divergence, which could be a useful strategy for molecular simulation-based ab initio design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available