4.7 Article

Fragment-Based Electronic Structure Approach for Computing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts in Molecular Crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 4862-4872

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct500749h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1362465]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1362465] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1362465] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First-principles chemical shielding tensor predictions play a critical role in studying molecular crystal structures using nuclear magnetic resonance. Fragment-based electronic structure methods have dramatically improved the ability to model molecular crystal structures and energetics using high-level electronic structure methods. Here, a many-body expansion fragment approach is applied to the calculation of chemical shielding tensors in molecular crystals. First, the impact of truncating the many-body expansion at different orders and the role of electrostatic embedding are examined on a series of molecular clusters extracted from molecular crystals. Second, the ability of these techniques to assign three polymorphic forms of the drug sulfanilamide to the corresponding experimental C-13 spectra is assessed. This challenging example requires discriminating among spectra whose C-13 chemical shifts differ by only a few parts per million (ppm) across the different polymorphs. Fragment-based PBE0/6-311+G(2d,p) level chemical shielding predictions correctly assign these three polymorphs and reproduce the sulfanilamide experimental C-13 chemical shifts with 1 ppm accuracy. The results demonstrate that fragment approaches are competitive with the widely used gauge-invariant projector augmented wave (GIPAW) periodic density functional theory calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available