4.7 Article

Anisotropic Coarse-Grained Model for Proteins Based On Gay-Berne and Electric Multipole Potentials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 731-750

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct400974z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012AA01A305, 2012CB721002]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31370714, 91227126]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. Welch foundation [F-1691]
  5. National Institute of Health [GM106137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gay-Berne anisotropic potential has been widely used to evaluate the nonbonded interactions between coarse-grained particles being described as elliptical rigid bodies. In this paper, we are presenting a coarse-grained model for twenty kinds of amino acids and proteins, based on the anisotropic Gay-Berne and point electric multipole (EMP) potentials. We demonstrate that the anisotropic coarse-grained model, namely GBEMP model, is able to reproduce many key features observed from experimental protein structures (Dunbrack Library), as well as from atomistic force field simulations (using AMOEBA, AMBER, and CHARMM force fields), while saving the computational cost by a factor of about 10-200 depending on specific cases and atomistic models. More importantly, unlike other coarse-grained approaches, our framework is based on the fundamental intermolecular forces with explicit treatment of electrostatic and repulsion-dispersion forces. As a result, the coarse-grained protein model presented an accurate description of nonbonded interactions (particularly electrostatic component) between hetero/homodimers (such as peptide-peptide, peptide-water). In addition, the encouraging performance of the model was reflected by the excellent correlation between GBEMP and AMOEBA models in the calculations of the dipole moment of peptides. In brief, the GBEMP model given here is general and transferable, suitable for simulating complex biomolecular systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available