4.7 Article

Optimized Structure and Vibrational Properties by Error Affected Potential Energy Surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 4204-4215

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct300576n

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CINECA [HP10AOW1-FU]
  2. European Research Council within the VII Framework Program of the European Union [240624]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precise theoretical determination of the geometrical parameters of molecules at the minima of their potential energy surface and of the corresponding vibrational properties are of fundamental importance for the interpretation of vibrational spectroscopy experiments. Quantum Monte Carlo techniques are correlated electronic structure methods promising for large molecules,: which are intrinsically affected by stochastic errors on both energy and force calculations, making the mentioned calculations more challenging with respect to other more traditional quantum chemistry tools. To circumvent this drawback in the present work, we formulate the general problem of evaluating the molecular equilibrium structures, the harmonic frequencies, and the anharmonic coefficients of an error affected potential energy surface. The proposed approach, based on a multidimensional fitting procedure, is illustrated together with a critical evaluation of systematic and statistical errors. We observe that the use of forces, instead of energies in the fitting procedure reduces the statistical uncertainty of the vibrational parameters by 1 order of magnitude. Preliminary results based on variational Monte Carlo calculations on the water molecule demonstrate the possibility to evaluate geometrical parameters and harmonic and anharmonic coefficients at this level of theory with an affordable computational Cost and a small stochastic uncertainty (<0.07% for geometries and <0.7% for vibrational properties).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available