4.5 Review

Evolution of the activated sludge process: the first 50 years

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 608-640

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4565

Keywords

activated sludge; historical evolution; system modifications; substrate removal; process kinetics and stoichiometry; microbial storage; microbiology; particle size distribution; emerging technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents a critical overview of the first 50 years in the evolution of the activated sludge process. Recognition of the role of aeration and microbial activity in the purification of sewage in the early studies established the basis for the accidental discovery of the process, which was immediately adapted into practice. The problems encountered during operation started a period of empirical expansion with many process modifications. As scientific support lagged behind practice, efforts were then directed towards exploring and understanding the fundamentals of the system related to substrate removal mechanisms, microbiology, process kinetics and stoichiometry, nitrogen transformations and, then, translating accumulated information into design. Extensive research generated remarkable findings which should be regarded as major milestones for future progress in many areas such as fractionation of substrate and biomass, particle size distribution, and substrate storage. A rational foundation of the activated sludge process for the removal of organic carbon could then be established based on mass balance. This approach also defined essential parameters that could relate microbial reactions involved with plant design and operation. Scientific ideas and discoveries have also enabled conceptual development of many emerging technologies such as the sequencing batch reactor, enhanced biological phosphorus removal, the oxic-settling anaerobic process, and the super-fast membrane bioreactor. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available